October 8, 2004

Aliens and Citizens

Posted in Uncategorized at 1:50 pm by thelawthoughts

How alien does one have to be before they will be deported? Not very, it seems. In Singh v Cth, it was held recently that Tania Singh, 5, is an alien for the purposes of the Citizenship Act (Cth) and is now set for deportation back to her (parents’) native India. Fair enough, some would say, as she does not qualify as a citizen under the provisions of the Act. The question we need to ask is, to what extent should Parliament be able to take a term like ‘alien’ and define its meaning?

For a small girl, born in Australia, attending State schools, to be held an alien is one step too far. The High Court has given Parliament the authority under this decision to determine the limits of its own power under the Constitution. Currently, the Act defines children who have lived in the country for ten years to qualify as citizens. Admittedly, Amanda Vanstone is not about to propose a law which holds all people, say, born outside Australia as aliens. But, under this decision, what is stopping the Parliament defining ‘citizen’ in an ever more arbitrary fashion, excluding even more defenceless individuals from gaining citizenship in Australia. Nothing. Nothing at all…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: