December 20, 2004

Hungry for change

Posted in Uncategorized at 5:52 pm by thelawthoughts

Amanda Vanstone is ‘angry’ at Andrew Bartlett, because he is ‘staging’ a hunger strike in support of similar action by detainees at the Baxter Detention Centre. Why, because he is right?

Vanstone cites the health risks involved and accuses Bartlett of setting a bad example by this sort of protest. Isn’t that the point? No other type of protest penetrates Amanda’s skull and, if I were in Baxter, I would probably rather wither into a wrinkled prune and die than stay detained for no good reason.

At last a political leader in this country is showing leadership. It is sad that the Democrats waited until they were an impotent political force to take this kind of action. It just shows how few in positions of political influence in this country are willing to stand up and directly take on the government on this issue, rather than issue sound bites to the press.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: